<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early June movie round-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:51:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7061</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burlaki.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-7061</guid>
		<description>Ilya: you should&#039;ve been in the US for its first surge of popularity... oy. Talk about burn-out.

Brian: I vaguely remembered that, too, so I googled. He was sued for ripping off &quot;I Want a New Drug&quot; by Huey Lewis and the News, which had come out earlier the same year. The case settled out of court. Interestingly, according to wikipedia, Huey recently remarked on a VH1 special that Ray had been the one who paid in the settlement, and Ray is now suing Huey for a breach of confidentiality. These things just never end sometimes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya: you should&#8217;ve been in the US for its first surge of popularity&#8230; oy. Talk about burn-out.</p>
<p>Brian: I vaguely remembered that, too, so I googled. He was sued for ripping off &#8220;I Want a New Drug&#8221; by Huey Lewis and the News, which had come out earlier the same year. The case settled out of court. Interestingly, according to wikipedia, Huey recently remarked on a VH1 special that Ray had been the one who paid in the settlement, and Ray is now suing Huey for a breach of confidentiality. These things just never end sometimes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7059</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burlaki.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-7059</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember the whole story, but I&#039;m pretty sure Ray Parker Jr. was accused and/or convicted of stealing that song from someone else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember the whole story, but I&#8217;m pretty sure Ray Parker Jr. was accused and/or convicted of stealing that song from someone else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burlaki.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>Actually, I prefer the same type of comedy as well, which helps explain why I have not been impressed with recent on-screen comedies for a long time.  That comedy layer is probably just too thin for me in &lt;em&gt;Ghostbusters&lt;/em&gt;.

Incidentally, I&#039;m pretty sick of the theme song.  There is a series of nauseating commercials for some phone assistance service in the UK that uses it as the audio track...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I prefer the same type of comedy as well, which helps explain why I have not been impressed with recent on-screen comedies for a long time.  That comedy layer is probably just too thin for me in <em>Ghostbusters</em>.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I&#8217;m pretty sick of the theme song.  There is a series of nauseating commercials for some phone assistance service in the UK that uses it as the audio track&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7043</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burlaki.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-7043</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brian on this one: if we&#039;re being honest, the success of &lt;i&gt;Ghostbusters&lt;/i&gt; stemmed as much from the ubiquitous &quot;no ghosts&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.80stees.com/products/Distressed-Glowing-Ghostbusters-T-shirt.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;logo t-shirts&lt;/a&gt; and the popularity of Ray Parker Jr.&#039;s catchy theme song as from the quality of the movie itself. (That said, I still enjoy this film very much. But then I am on record as fiercely defending stuff others find dated.)

It&#039;s interesting that many so-called comedies from this time period really &lt;i&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; as funny as we remember them being, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s merely the passage of time that&#039;s responsible. It&#039;s more like, removed from the contemporary ad campaigns that pushed the idea of these movies being knee-slappingly hilarious, we can now see that many of them were actually more-or-less &quot;straight&quot; action movies with humor layered over the top, usually in the form of wisecracking leads. I&#039;m thinking now of Billy Crystal&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Running Scared&lt;/i&gt; and Eddie Murphy&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Beverly Hills Cop&lt;/i&gt;, among others. &lt;i&gt;Ghostbusters&lt;/i&gt; was a &lt;i&gt;bit&lt;/i&gt; more of a true comedy than those, but I think you could still make a case that it&#039;s really a sci-fi/fantasy movie that just happens to have moments of goofiness, and of course Bill Murray&#039;s dead-pan smart-aleck reactions.

Personally, I prefer that sort of comedy to the one-gag-every-90-seconds variety that dominates today. But again, that&#039;s just me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brian on this one: if we&#8217;re being honest, the success of <i>Ghostbusters</i> stemmed as much from the ubiquitous &#8220;no ghosts&#8221; <a href="http://www.80stees.com/products/Distressed-Glowing-Ghostbusters-T-shirt.asp" rel="nofollow">logo t-shirts</a> and the popularity of Ray Parker Jr.&#8217;s catchy theme song as from the quality of the movie itself. (That said, I still enjoy this film very much. But then I am on record as fiercely defending stuff others find dated.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that many so-called comedies from this time period really <i>aren&#8217;t</i> as funny as we remember them being, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s merely the passage of time that&#8217;s responsible. It&#8217;s more like, removed from the contemporary ad campaigns that pushed the idea of these movies being knee-slappingly hilarious, we can now see that many of them were actually more-or-less &#8220;straight&#8221; action movies with humor layered over the top, usually in the form of wisecracking leads. I&#8217;m thinking now of Billy Crystal&#8217;s <i>Running Scared</i> and Eddie Murphy&#8217;s <i>Beverly Hills Cop</i>, among others. <i>Ghostbusters</i> was a <i>bit</i> more of a true comedy than those, but I think you could still make a case that it&#8217;s really a sci-fi/fantasy movie that just happens to have moments of goofiness, and of course Bill Murray&#8217;s dead-pan smart-aleck reactions.</p>
<p>Personally, I prefer that sort of comedy to the one-gag-every-90-seconds variety that dominates today. But again, that&#8217;s just me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://burlaki.com/blog/2009/06/07/early-june-movie-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7033</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burlaki.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-7033</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ghostbusters&lt;/i&gt; was one of those movies that was more of a marketing blitz than just a movie.  The song was huge at the time, there were all sorts of tie-ins with the movie, and everyone seemed to go see it simultaneously, so everyone was talking about it.  Kind of the Susan Boyle of it&#039;s day, without YouTube to help it along.

I enjoy it when I catch it now for nostalgia reasons, but I can easily see how you&#039;d walk away underwhelmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ghostbusters</i> was one of those movies that was more of a marketing blitz than just a movie.  The song was huge at the time, there were all sorts of tie-ins with the movie, and everyone seemed to go see it simultaneously, so everyone was talking about it.  Kind of the Susan Boyle of it&#8217;s day, without YouTube to help it along.</p>
<p>I enjoy it when I catch it now for nostalgia reasons, but I can easily see how you&#8217;d walk away underwhelmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
